Australopithecus afarensis vs africanus: Lucy Meets Mrs Ples

Two fossils dominate the public image of the australopiths. Lucy — a 3.2-million-year-old skeleton from Ethiopia — is Australopithecus afarensis. Mrs Ples — a beautifully preserved skull from a South African cave — is Australopithecus africanus, the very first early human ancestor ever identified, back in 1924.

The Australopithecus afarensis vs africanus comparison sets East Africa against South Africa, and one gracile australopith against another. They are close cousins — but the differences between them sit right at the root of our own genus.

Who was Australopithecus afarensis?

Australopithecus afarensis lived in East Africa between roughly 3.9 and 2.9 million years ago. It is known from a superb fossil record, above all Lucy (AL 288-1) from Hadar, Ethiopia, and the Laetoli footprints in Tanzania — 3.66-million-year-old tracks frozen in volcanic ash that prove a confident upright stride. Afarensis walked the ground on two legs but kept long arms, curved fingers, and a cone-shaped ribcage for climbing.

Its brain was small (~380–490 cc), its face projecting and ape-like, and its body strongly size-dimorphic — males much larger than females. Widely regarded as a plausible ancestor of later hominins, it anchors the gracile australopith radiation. See the Australopithecus afarensis page.

Who was Australopithecus africanus?

Australopithecus africanus is the South African gracile australopith, living from about 3.3 to 2.1 million years ago. It holds a special place in history: the Taung Child, described by Raymond Dart in 1925, was the first fossil to suggest that humanity's origins lay in Africa. Decades later, Mrs Ples (Sts 5) from Sterkfontein became its iconic adult skull.

Africanus shares the small brain and climbing-and-walking body of afarensis, but its skull is a touch more rounded and some of its features are slightly more derived. Its exact role — ancestor of Homo, of the robust Paranthropus, or both — is debated. Full account on the Australopithecus africanus page.

The key differences

Geography and time

The cleanest split is where and when. Afarensis is the earlier, East African form; africanus is later and South African. Their ranges and (mostly) their time spans do not overlap, making them successive rather than simultaneous players.

Skull and teeth

Afarensis has a more projecting, primitive face and larger front teeth; africanus shows a somewhat rounder braincase and, in some specimens, larger cheek teeth — a faint hint in the direction of the heavy-chewing Paranthropus that would follow in South Africa.

Body

Both retained climbing adaptations alongside committed bipedalism. Afarensis shows especially marked differences in body size between the sexes; the picture for africanus is less clear because its skeletal sample is sparser.

Did they ever meet?

Almost certainly not. Separated by thousands of kilometres and, for the most part, by time, the two species occupied different corners of Africa. The interest is genealogical: many researchers see afarensis as ancestral to africanus, or both as branches close to the origin of Homo. They are relatives passing the baton across the continent, not contemporaries sharing a watering hole.

Why it matters

These two species are the workhorses of australopith science — the fossils on which ideas about early bipedalism, diet, growth, and the origin of Homo are tested. Comparing them shows that the gracile australopiths were not a single uniform stage but a varied, continent-spanning group, and it frames the central question of this part of the tree: which of these small-brained walkers gave rise to us?